Which type of contract will be enforced by the court?

The best choice is a valid contract, as it is the type of agreement that meets all the legal requirements necessary for enforcement in a court of law. A valid contract typically includes an offer, acceptance, consideration (something of value exchanged), and mutual consent from the parties involved, along with a lawful purpose.

Courts are designed to uphold valid contracts because they represent the intention of the parties to enter into a binding agreement. This means that if one party fails to fulfill their part of the contract, the other party can seek legal recourse to enforce the terms of the agreement.

In contrast, a void contract is one that is invalid from the outset and cannot be enforced by either party. An unenforceable contract may be valid but lacks the ability to be legally enforced due to some technicality or law, such as certain statutes of limitations or issues arising from how the contract was formed. A contingent contract depends on an uncertain event occurring, meaning it is not automatically enforceable until that event happens. Thus, the enforceability in a court strongly aligns with valid contracts, making it the most fitting choice.